Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 01:37:54 +0000 From: Tony <tony@ubik.demon.co.uk> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Cc: "Brandon D. Valentine" <bandix@looksharp.net> Subject: Re: Found NFS data corruption bug... (was Re: NFS: How to make FreeBSD fall on its face in one easy step ) Message-ID: <RWj092AyxUH8IwK8@ubik.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20011213043851.Y56723-100000@turtle.looksharp.net> References: <200112130608.fBD689K49906@apollo.backplane.com> <20011213043851.Y56723-100000@turtle.looksharp.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <20011213043851.Y56723-100000@turtle.looksharp.net>, Brandon D. Valentine <bandix@looksharp.net> writes > [snip] >but it still can't touch the FreeBSD NFS implementation. The more >robust you make it the easier it is for me to argue for deployment of >more FreeBSD systems in NFS server roles. The only advantage Linux has >got right now is XFS, which is admittedly a pretty large advantage on >multi terabyte filesystems where fsck is impossible. That is what I wanted to hear, an unambiguous argument that a solid implementation of JFS would be useful to some user segment. Tony To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?RWj092AyxUH8IwK8>