Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 01 May 1998 03:09:57 -0700
From:      "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
To:        asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami)
Cc:        phk@critter.freebsd.dk, ru@ucb.crimea.ua, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: kern/6466 -- Why you closed it, Poul?! 
Message-ID:  <26778.894017397@time.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 01 May 1998 01:03:36 PDT." <199805010803.BAA28825@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
TWO.  2.2.7 is a given since we've got a whole lot of folks committed
to the 2.2-stable branch now (many of whom didn't even jump over from
2.1 until 2.2.6 was released) and 2.2.7 is the obvious fix-and-polish
release to follow 2.2.6.  From there, it's also safe to assume that
one last "this is the end of the 2.2 branch!" release would be in the
cards since 3.0 isn't even going to come out until Oct/Nov and it'd be
reasonable to also assume that it will be several months after that
(3.0.1? 3.1?) before people are really comfortable with the idea of
moving from 2.x to 3.x.  As keen as we are to retire our branches, I
think 2.1 proved that we just don't have a lot of choice if we're
going to take as long as we do in getting our experimental branches
ready for release. :-)

- Jordan

>  * If?  We're planning at least 2 more dude! :)
> 
> TWO?!?
> 
> Satoshi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?26778.894017397>