Date: Sat, 02 Aug 1997 13:38:09 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: ade@demon.net Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports-current/packages-current discontinued Message-ID: <16092.870554289@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 02 Aug 1997 20:55:03 BST." <E0wukGW-00007A-00@genghis.eng.demon.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[Directed only to -current; 3 mailing lists is too many] > Surely this would depend on how far things "bite the dust". > Personally, I don't think it would be unreasonable to have a > situation where the base system is made up of two distinct, but > heavily inter-related parts, namely that chunk of the current core > system that is definitely needed to run any kind of system at all, > and other parts which aren't necessarily required, but which are > stamped with a kind of "seal of approval" for use with FreeBSD. That option's already been discussed to death. ;-) The question is how to do this effectively, not in the concept. The concept is the easy part. ;) Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16092.870554289>