Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 18:19:16 -0500 From: Lewis Donzis <lew@perftech.com> To: Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, deischen@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mq on kqueue broken after upgrade to FreeBSD 11 Message-ID: <DEAB8E82-A58F-47B6-9193-D729A87F373C@perftech.com> In-Reply-To: <20160930184418.1047afc2@kan> References: <8A6CD0D3-C4D5-40DF-B2AD-4C454CC88AD1@perftech.com> <20160930094544.GP38409@kib.kiev.ua> <19A6EEAA-C68E-4DAD-B98F-4D904734BD8B@perftech.com> <20160930152006.GS38409@kib.kiev.ua> <20160930184418.1047afc2@kan>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> On Sep 30, 2016, at 5:44 PM, Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> wrote: > No objection, but possible suggestion: if the primary use of this > symbol is for tests and nothing else, maybe it does belong in > FBSDprivate_1.0 FBSDprivate_1.0 section instead? The primary use for us is definitely not testing — it appears to be the only way to get a handle that can be used with kevent(). In that regard, it would be even nicer if it was a regular mq_*() function, even if it had to be non-portable, rather than beginning with “__” which makes it look internal only. lewhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DEAB8E82-A58F-47B6-9193-D729A87F373C>