Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 21:27:27 -0500 From: Jon Hamilton <hamilton@pobox.com> To: chris@calldei.com Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>, Blaz Zupan <blaz@gold.amis.net>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ps doesn't need privileges? Message-ID: <19990912022727.11D73CA@woodstock.monkey.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 11 Sep 1999 13:22:07 CDT." <19990911132207.J906@holly.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <19990911132207.J906@holly.dyndns.org>, Chris Costello wrote: } On Sun, Sep 12, 1999, Peter Wemm wrote: } > Now that I think about it, it shouldn't be too hard (TM) to finish off the } > /proc/pid/cmdline stuff so that ps didn't need to access /mem and didn't } > need setgid at all. } } What about the `e' flag? What about people who don't use /proc? Maybe I'm misreading; is the plan to make ps work (at least with most of the bells and whistles) only with /proc, or is the plan to make it an option to either strip the setgid and use proc, or to leave it and use kmem? -- Jon Hamilton hamilton@pobox.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990912022727.11D73CA>