Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:24:47 -0700
From:      Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Cc:        Scott Long <scott4long@yahoo.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, Dieter BSD <dieterbsd@gmail.com>, scottl@FreeBSD.org, gibbs@FreeBSD.org, mjacob@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: IBM blade server abysmal disk write performances
Message-ID:  <1358544287.32417.251.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301182217590.1478@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References:  <CAA3ZYrBV9f%2BcHx4jvS0UKTr%2Bp7eNUBA0S2%2Bv9oZAHqwm9VBOWw@mail.gmail.com> <6C0B86E6-195C-4D35-AE40-3D2F9F6D28FB@yahoo.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301182217590.1478@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 22:18 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > and anyone who enabled SATA WC or complained about I/O slowness
> > would be forced into Siberian salt mines for the remainder of their lives.
> 
> so reserve a place for me there.

Yeah, me too.  I prefer to go for all-out performance with separate risk
mitigation strategies.  I wouldn't set up a client datacenter that way,
but it's wholly appropriate for what I do with this machine.

-- Ian





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1358544287.32417.251.camel>