Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:24:47 -0700 From: Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: Scott Long <scott4long@yahoo.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, Dieter BSD <dieterbsd@gmail.com>, scottl@FreeBSD.org, gibbs@FreeBSD.org, mjacob@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: IBM blade server abysmal disk write performances Message-ID: <1358544287.32417.251.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301182217590.1478@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <CAA3ZYrBV9f%2BcHx4jvS0UKTr%2Bp7eNUBA0S2%2Bv9oZAHqwm9VBOWw@mail.gmail.com> <6C0B86E6-195C-4D35-AE40-3D2F9F6D28FB@yahoo.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301182217590.1478@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 22:18 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > and anyone who enabled SATA WC or complained about I/O slowness > > would be forced into Siberian salt mines for the remainder of their lives. > > so reserve a place for me there. Yeah, me too. I prefer to go for all-out performance with separate risk mitigation strategies. I wouldn't set up a client datacenter that way, but it's wholly appropriate for what I do with this machine. -- Ian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1358544287.32417.251.camel>