Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1996 12:32:31 +0400 (MSD) From: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (aka Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage) <ache@astral.msk.su> To: stesin@elvisti.kiev.ua (Andrew V. Stesin) Cc: davidg@Root.COM, jkh@time.cdrom.com, jdp@polstra.com, nate@sri.MT.net, stable@freebsd.org, committers@freebsd.org, scanner@webspan.net Subject: Re: Status of -stable Message-ID: <199606100832.MAA00526@astral.msk.su> In-Reply-To: <199606100818.LAA16906@office.elvisti.kiev.ua> from "Andrew V. Stesin" at "Jun 10, 96 11:18:19 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Yes, that's obvious. I think the whole idea of having two > branches _both_ developed but with different speed is a vaste > of human power. (Why did they invented this? I thought...) I completely agree here. -current must be "stable" as in good old days. Many interesting things commited to -current long time ago never appearse into -stable (for various reasons). If this line will be continued, they never be released at all. -- Andrey A. Chernov : And I rest so composedly, /Now, in my bed, ache@astral.msk.su : That any beholder /Might fancy me dead - http://dt.demos.su/~ache : Might start at beholding me, /Thinking me dead. RELCOM Team,FreeBSD Team : E.A.Poe From "For Annie" 1849
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606100832.MAA00526>