Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 14:52:38 +0000 (GMT) From: Jonathon McKitrick <jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za> Cc: Brian Anderson <bunicula@rcn.com>, "Stephen F. Tanner" <sftanner@bellsouth.net>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: unix games... Re: ??? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.9912231451450.20874-100000@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <47728.945944361@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 23 Dec 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote: >are massive resource hungry hogs. Our scheduler is optimized for many >processes, some long-running and some short-lived cpu-bound hogs. I've heard MS people say Linux's scheduler is dogmeat compared to NT's. Is ours superior to Linux's? -jm To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.9912231451450.20874-100000>