Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:01:16 +0200 From: Brad Knowles <blk@skynet.be> To: "Patrick Bihan-Faou" <patrick@mindstep.com>, <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Integrating QMAIL in the world Message-ID: <v04220804b5174853417a@[195.238.21.91]> In-Reply-To: <14be01bfa26c$361e3420$040aa8c0@local.mindstep.com> References: <143f01bfa253$a130abd0$040aa8c0@local.mindstep.com> <20000409141112.A1252@dragon.nuxi.com> <14be01bfa26c$361e3420$040aa8c0@local.mindstep.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 5:40 PM -0400 2000/4/9, Patrick Bihan-Faou wrote: >> Then people that are running a mail server could install either the >> Sendmail, Postfix, Qmail, Zmail, etc... MTA ports. > > Sounds like a great idea. The reason why I am doing this is because I DONT > want sendmail. The solution that is being implemented sounds like the best > way to approach this. I can support this position as well. I don't think we're likely to find consensus on replacing one MTA with another (the community is too diverse for that), so replacing a full-featured MTA with one that has the minimum necessary features for "nullclient" operations and then allowing people to install whatever full-featured MTA they may want seems to be the best alternative. -- These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy ====================================================================== Brad Knowles, <blk@skynet.be> || Belgacom Skynet SA/NV Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin || Rue Colonel Bourg, 124 Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/12.49 || B-1140 Brussels http://www.skynet.be || Belgium To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?v04220804b5174853417a>