Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 23:04:24 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Burkard Meyendriesch <bm@malepartus.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd64 -CURRENT: portinstall x11/kde3 fails, missing shared libraries Message-ID: <20040318070424.GA77223@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20040318075835.6a2618bd.bm@malepartus.de> References: <20040318075835.6a2618bd.bm@malepartus.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 07:58:35AM +0100, Burkard Meyendriesch wrote: > Are there any differences in making ports between i386 STABLE and amd64 > CURRENT? What is going wrong? What can I do to solve this? Compare the build logs of the openldap port from i386 and amd64; it's possible the build is turning off shared library support because of a buggy configure script, or something. Kris --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAWUn3Wry0BWjoQKURAlEsAKDTFDPjUwp/y1qcZwIQ7tkI7sMfNQCg/pNA l53keeCojgjsG+egGRd9xgE= =8iA9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040318070424.GA77223>