Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 23:15:18 +0200 From: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw tee fixed [cvs commit: src/sbin/ipfw ipfw.8src/sys/netinet ip_fw_pfil.c] Message-ID: <41460DE6.6070908@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20040913204318.GA71517@ip.net.ua> References: <4145D02C.D02A18A0@freebsd.org> <20040913183038.GA25795@ip.net.ua> <4145EA7C.3000902@freebsd.org> <20040913185452.GB25795@ip.net.ua> <4145EE92.2060802@freebsd.org> <20040913204318.GA71517@ip.net.ua>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > I specifically said divert(4) not ipfw(8). ;) I'm sorry. Too many tomatoes on my eyes... ;-) What do you think of the attached patch to divert(4)? -- Andre Index: divert.4 =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/share/man/man4/divert.4,v retrieving revision 1.29 diff -u -p -r1.29 divert.4 --- divert.4 3 Jul 2004 18:29:20 -0000 1.29 +++ divert.4 13 Sep 2004 21:13:56 -0000 @@ -128,6 +128,11 @@ packet to get diverted. If different fragments divert to different ports, then which port ultimately gets chosen is unpredictable. .Pp +Note that packets arriving on the divert socket by the +.Xr ipfw 8 +tee action are delivered as-is and packet fragments do not get reassembled +in this case. +.Pp Packets are received and sent unchanged, except that packets read as outgoing have invalid IP header checksums, and packets written as outgoing have their IP header checksums overwrittenhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41460DE6.6070908>