Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 14:54:32 +0200 From: Vallo Kallaste <kalts@estpak.ee> To: Attila Nagy <bra@fsn.hu> Cc: Gerrit =?utf-8?B?S8O8aG4=?= <gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de>, current@freebsd.org, re@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does bg fsck have problems with large filesystems? Message-ID: <20030128125432.GB4813@tiiu.internal> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.50.0301281141100.28577-100000@scribble.fsn.hu> References: <20030127174127.GD71664@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <Pine.LNX.4.50.0301281141100.28577-100000@scribble.fsn.hu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 11:44:03AM +0100, Attila Nagy <bra@fsn.hu> wrote: > > I've just installed my first 5.0-rel system and did some > > "torture-testing". When resetting the machine to test the backgrounded > > fsck I experienced the following problem: All filesystems came back > > quickly and bg fsck worked fine, except for one. I had created a large > > (>50GB) /export filesystem on with fsck reproducively hang. > See PR kern/47105. > Although it speaks of much larger filesystems, than your, the problem is > there. > > I've already written to Kirk McKusick, but it seems that he has a lot of > work, because I didn't get answer. > > If anybody wants to look into this problem, I can give access to the > machine (even serial console)... I don't see it listed in 5.0-RELEASE ERRATA. Several people have now reported problems with background fsck and in the case Kirk as original author is loaded with other work I see no justification to not mention the brokenness of bgfsck. -- Vallo Kallaste kalts@estpak.ee To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030128125432.GB4813>