Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:06:06 +0200 From: "Ulrich Spoerlein" <uspoerlein@gmail.com> To: "Scott Long" <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org, njl@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Retirement of CAM_QUIRK_NOSERIAL Message-ID: <7ad7ddd90710020406i126fb1a4ieff2e4ed597d0896@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4701CFA2.4040700@samsco.org> References: <46E615C4.1010605@samsco.org> <20070916115427.GA1427@roadrunner.spoerlein.net> <46ED6C50.4040104@samsco.org> <20070918202250.GA1403@roadrunner.spoerlein.net> <4701CFA2.4040700@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/2/07, Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> wrote: > Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: > > Ok, I played around a bit and with your patch applied, I have to > > *remove* the quirk for my Samsung device, then it starts attaching > > again. That's a good thing, right? :) > > > > umass0: <Samsung YP-U2, class 0/0, rev 2.00/10.01, addr 2> on uhub3 > > da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > > da0: <Samsung YP-U2 0100> Removable Direct Access SCSI-4 device > > da0: 40.000MB/s transfers > > da0: 999MB (511616 2048 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 249C) > > > > There are only two other devices right now, that require a SHUTTLE_INIT > > quirk, perhaps they are broken by your patch, too. > > So where does this stand? Is my patch still a regression for you? Not, if I also remove the SHUTTLE_INIT quirk for my Samsung device, then everything is back to normal. Uli
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7ad7ddd90710020406i126fb1a4ieff2e4ed597d0896>