Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 17:09:31 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 205476] x11-toolkits/wxgtk30 Provide backtrace option to configure Message-ID: <bug-205476-13-bt6U4uN7On@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-205476-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-205476-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205476 --- Comment #6 from Chris Hutchinson <portmaster@bsdforge.com> --- (In reply to Kyle Evans from comment #2) > Hello! > > The attached patch didn't quite work out as planned- with a minor > modification to remove the '!empty' while checking PORT_OPTIONS:MBACKTRACE- > and testing against -CURRENT: > > * Enabling the option enables backtrace as expected > * Disabling the option disables backtrace as expected > * The option is defaulted to backtrace disabled as expected > > I will attach the revised version that I effectively used in these tests, > for the sake of being perfectly explicit about the modification required. Do > I need to go back to 9.3-RELEASE and 9-STABLE and prove this option is > effectively a no-op there? While I *did* examine (and approve) the patch. It looks fine. I *think* a QA run that proves it's not possible to *enable* Backtrace on a 9.x system, might be required. *But* IMHO the patch (svn diff) speaks for itself. :-) Thanks Kyle! --Chris -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-205476-13-bt6U4uN7On>