Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:34:34 +0900 (JST) From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: gabor@FreeBSD.org Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org, www@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: combining docs@ and www@? Message-ID: <20121031.163434.1588854285324282842.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <5090CD31.8010201@FreeBSD.org> References: <CAF6rxg=JVZu-H%2Bo4kZqHb6YF8PpqadbQZLOhWP_Cx%2Bo87Lsc_g@mail.gmail.com> <5090CD31.8010201@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----Security_Multipart(Wed_Oct_31_16_34_34_2012_641)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@freebsd.org> wrote in <5090CD31.8010201@FreeBSD.org>: ga> Em 31-10-2012 04:49, Eitan Adler escreveu: ga> > Hey all, ga> > ga> > I'd like to propose combining www@ and docs@ into one mailing list ga> ga> Off: it's actually doc@ not docs@, which apparently seems to work. ga> ga> On: I support the idea. Probably it was thought earlier that a www@ list ga> in itself was useful but in practice, it isn't that useful in itself. I ga> also have one mail folder for the two and I use procmail to collect both ga> of them there. I agree with merging the two into one. There was a similar opinion at BSDCan, too. -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Wed_Oct_31_16_34_34_2012_641)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAlCQ1IoACgkQTyzT2CeTzy1vhwCgtshWmc/Zv7esF41i/FAyroZf az8AoIJ+GMqaNQ0WiyfYAEtWiw8Xht6d =GV7X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Wed_Oct_31_16_34_34_2012_641)----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121031.163434.1588854285324282842.hrs>