Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:09:53 +0200 From: Aleksandr Rybalko <ray@ddteam.net> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any objections/comments on axing out old ATA stack? Message-ID: <20130328160953.f0ca035403fb4b4adddfe6e0@ddteam.net> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmon-8FaLa-=F=Z3dL85FPoRr%2Bp3kt%2Btr1fo7AkOV9hhyCA@mail.gmail.com> References: <51536306.5030907@FreeBSD.org> <CAJ-Vmon-8FaLa-=F=Z3dL85FPoRr%2Bp3kt%2Btr1fo7AkOV9hhyCA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:43:07 -0700 Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: > My main concern with the new stuff is that it requires CAM and that's > reasonably big compared to the standalone ATA code. > > It'd be nice if we could slim down the CAM stack a bit first; it makes > embedding it on the smaller devices really freaking painful. /me never seen embedded devices with ATA/SATA and less than 64MB of RAM. (i386/i486 old machines does not count :) ) I'm missing something? > > Thanks, > > > > adrian > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Aleksandr Rybalko <ray@ddteam.net>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130328160953.f0ca035403fb4b4adddfe6e0>