Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 15:25:29 -0500 From: Jon Noack <noackjr@alumni.rice.edu> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@apropo.ro> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd/dragonfly/linux/netbsd benchmarks Message-ID: <40731239.2070605@alumni.rice.edu> In-Reply-To: <20040406224924.5e6515f8@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> References: <4072FB2F.8050102@alumni.rice.edu> <20040406224924.5e6515f8@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4/6/2004 2:49 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 13:47:11 -0500 Jon Noack <noackjr@alumni.rice.edu> wrote: >> Saw this on the DragonFly kernel list: >> http://geri.cc.fer.hr/~ivoras/osbench_h.html >> >> Just wanted to see what everyone thought... > > Forbidden You don't have permission to access /~ivoras/osbench_h.html > on this server. > > Apache/1.3.27 Server at geri.cc.fer.hr Port 80 Apparently the author had second thoughts... From memory: It was FreeBSD 4.9, FreeBSD 5.2, DragonFly (3/17/2004), Linux 2.4.25, Linux 2.6.5, and NetBSD 1.6.2. About all I remember were that things were fairly even except Linux filesystem performance was better (I think both XFS and ext3 were benchmarked). Not earth-shattering stuff, but there were a few interesting points (that now escape me). In any case, sorry for the noise. Jon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40731239.2070605>