Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 07:26:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Unga <unga888@yahoo.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sched_ule performance on single CPU Message-ID: <800020.59686.qm@web57008.mail.re3.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <E1JkI7L-000GIu-QH@dilbert.ticketswitch.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--- Pete French <petefrench@ticketswitch.com> wrote: > > What I refer is, when quickly open multiple tabs > (7 or > > 8) in firefox and click on the fist tab to type > user > > id while other tabs still downloading, its seems > there > > is a minor yet noticeable delay that I did not > > experience with sched_4bsd. > > Ah, O.K. - havent noticed that, and it wouldnt > bother me > really. What I found is that if you are doing a > 'make buildworld' > in a window then you can't really use firefox > properly > at all using 4BSD, but you can with ULE. For that I > am > happy to put up with minor delays - overally it's a > lot > more usable. > > > To me, its seems there is no noticeable gain with > > sched_ule, but rather the desktop is bit slow to > > respond. > > Try the compiling experiment and see if you get the > same effect > as I did. For me it;s a bit win, because I couldnt > use the > desktop when I was compiling code. Swingd and > roundabouts > though - if you dont od big comiles then it may seem > theres no > benifit for you. > I listen to FLAC on amarok on professional headphones at the same time browsing web while compiling 'make buildworld' :) Unga __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?800020.59686.qm>