Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 18:24:42 -0400 From: "Frank J. Laszlo" <laszlof@vonostingroup.com> To: obrien@freebsd.org Cc: Sebastian Schulze Struchtrup <seb@struchtrup.com> Subject: Re: alternative options for ports Message-ID: <416DAB2A.3060900@vonostingroup.com> In-Reply-To: <20041013193547.GB53895@hub.freebsd.org> References: <416C0DE8.3000004@struchtrup.com> <416C35A5.4040703@vonostingroup.com> <20041013123840.GB1301@FreeBSD.org> <20041013193547.GB53895@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David O'Brien wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 12:38:40PM +0000, Eivind Eklund wrote:
>
>
>>On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 03:51:01PM -0400, Frank Laszlo wrote:
>>If you've got more *specific* problems with usability (like the batch
>>build problem above), I'm very interested, as I'm trying to collect
>>these for doing a new round of fixes for the options support in
>>bsd.port.mk.
>>
>>
>
>BTW, has anyone started to impliment the NO_<portname>_OPTIONS feature
>that was requested?
>
>
>
That sounds like a great idea to me, I would definately like to devote
some time to implementing such a feature if the demand is there. It
doesnt sound like it would be very difficult to acomplish. And I'm glad
to see someone shares my feelings on dialog's in ports :)
Regards,
Frank
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?416DAB2A.3060900>