Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Jul 2017 06:12:42 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 220786] audio/qjackctl: Update to 0.4.5
Message-ID:  <bug-220786-13-XrUGRH1bEX@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-220786-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-220786-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220786

--- Comment #3 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Yuri Victorovich from comment #2)

I'm hinting that its highly beneficial to be more explicit and provide deta=
il,
which goes for everything related to issue/bug tracking. :) This is especia=
lly
the case non-trivial changes.

tldr: "Leave no (even potential) questions unanswered" makes it much less
likely an issue will be ignored and much more likely to promote
action/progress.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-220786-13-XrUGRH1bEX>