Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 18:44:14 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger <pi@opsec.eu> To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MSIX failure Message-ID: <20100909164414.GI34314@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=XqVaAWxuZJ39mK4hYpg6%2Bm04tzN9jsJ7scTD-@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTikvd09fw3fUhxsXDhMoWE-kvMoPjXPSTfzYY73T@mail.gmail.com> <20100909125400.GA18723@lordcow.org> <20100909131340.GA75829@icarus.home.lan> <20100909132519.GB21535@lordcow.org> <20100909140224.GA76889@icarus.home.lan> <20100909142226.GA25370@lordcow.org> <20100909142455.GA77677@icarus.home.lan> <20100909142928.GA25877@lordcow.org> <20100909143357.GG34314@home.opsec.eu> <AANLkTi=XqVaAWxuZJ39mK4hYpg6%2Bm04tzN9jsJ7scTD-@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > > Basically, when the securelevel is positive, the kernel restricts > > certain tasks; not even the superuser (i.e., root) is allowed to > > do them. > OH YUCK, another root isn't really root, so is it also possibly > the reason for the MSIX failure?? Is this pile, er feature, on by default? No, not by default. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 10 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100909164414.GI34314>