Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 15:00:40 +0900 From: "=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCMGZCPBsoQiAbJEJONTBsTzobKEI=?=" <ryuichiro.imura@nttdtec.co.jp> To: "Steve Price" <sprice@hiwaay.net>, "Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami" <asami@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: "Chris Piazza" <cpiazza@home.net>, "FreeBSD Ports" <ports@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: USE_QT2 in bsd.port.mk Message-ID: <001501bef2ac$fd7d5a20$6310a8c0@imurar.nttdtec.co.jp>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--MimeMultipartBoundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > * From: Steve Price <sprice@hiwaay.net> > > * # Err, misread that. It is not at all compatible with qt-1.4x > * > * Speaking of incompatible and repository copies... Does anyone > * but me think it would be a good idea to put this port in a > * directory like qt200 instead of qt2, since we've had a history > >Great idea. I was going to suggest this myself after getting Chris's >response, but you beat me to it. :) > >So, what's it going to be? It's qt-2.0.1 now, so is qt201 ok, Chris? > >Satoshi Qt says 2-VER_MAJ 0-VER_MIN 1-VER_PATCH so, next Qt-2.0.2, Qt-2.0.3... shuld be compatible, I think. Qt renames but directory name remains, it seems strange, isn't it? I think qt20 is better. ----- R. Imura --MimeMultipartBoundary-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?001501bef2ac$fd7d5a20$6310a8c0>