Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:54:54 +0400 From: Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, jhb@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ru@FreeBSD.org, gad@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/make make.1 Message-ID: <20051013135453.GC56193@comp.chem.msu.su> In-Reply-To: <20051012.155313.60482924.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20051012170509.GH99170@submonkey.net> <p06230905bf72f8f32a3b@[128.113.24.47]> <200510121440.15780.jhb@freebsd.org> <20051012.155313.60482924.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 03:53:13PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <200510121440.15780.jhb@freebsd.org> > John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> writes: > : make(1) does honor some special environment variables like MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX, > : but __MAKE_CONF is not one of them. It is handled in sys.mk, not in the > : make(1) program itself. > > We've already wasted too much time on this bikeshed... > > However, nearly nobody uses %POSIX, so it should be in make(1). > sys.mk is a standard part of the system, and make(1) should document > it and its behavior. No problem, __MAKE_CONF mentioned will be among other improvements to the make(1) page that are to be committed in a day or two. Ruslan doesn't object to it since now __MAKE_CONF will be described in an apparent connection to sys.mk. -- Yar
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051013135453.GC56193>