Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 15:13:23 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> To: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis <jonny@jonny.eng.br> Cc: julian@whistle.com (Julian Elischer), jonny@jonny.eng.br, asami@cs.berkeley.edu, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: softupdates on / Message-ID: <199901282313.PAA11607@apollo.backplane.com> References: <199901281951.RAA26420@roma.coe.ufrj.br>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
://
:// kirk has convinsing arguments against it and "He's the man"
: ^^^^^^^^^
:
:I got your point, but can you list these arguments ? If it's only "he
:wants it this way, god only knows why", it's allright, but if there's
:a technical reason, I'd like to know.
:
:Thanks in advance,
:
: Jonny
Well, I can think of one right off the bat -- Kirk's been wanting to make
fsck more and more softupdates-aware. This means that softupates really
should be a filesystem flag and not a mount option. To avoid mistakes.
I think the eventual goal is to be able to mount a softupdates partition
either immediately or with only minimal cleanup and then finish cleaning
it up in the background, live.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon@backplane.com>
:--
:Joao Carlos Mendes Luis M.Sc. Student
:jonny@jonny.eng.br Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
:"This .sig is not meant to be politically correct."
:
:To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
:with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
:
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901282313.PAA11607>