Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:22:30 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bzero & bcopy alignment Message-ID: <45B49066.2030100@fer.hr> In-Reply-To: <20070122101551.GJ837@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <ep0mlv$194$1@sea.gmane.org> <20070121140019.A83688@xorpc.icir.org> <ep0p8i$86q$1@sea.gmane.org> <20070122084634.GH837@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <45B48968.20506@fer.hr> <20070122101551.GJ837@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Peter Jeremy wrote: > On Mon, 2007-Jan-22 10:52:40 +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: >> Peter Jeremy wrote: >>> On Sun, 2007-Jan-21 23:25:14 +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: >>>> Any magic tricks to identify the caller of "current" function in the kernel? >>> On gcc: __builtin_return_address() >> Ok, this looks nice. Can I convert the result to something processable >> by addr2line? (in other words: is kernel relocated on load?) > > Yes and no (respectively) for the core kernel (kld's are relocated). Ok, so assuming the caller is in the kernel, the address is directly usable in addr2line?home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45B49066.2030100>