Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 10:55:27 +1030 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@iafrica.com> Cc: sos@freebsd.dk, (freebsd-current@freebsd.org) <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>, Cejka Rudolf <cejkar@dcse.fee.vutbr.cz> Subject: Re: ATAPI and ATAPI_STATIC with the new ATA* driver? Message-ID: <XFMail.990304105527.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <79192.920464790@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03-Mar-99 Sheldon Hearn wrote: > I'm not sure I understand what real-world frustrations people are having > here. Is this thread the product of reactionary criticism, or are there > real examples of situations in which there are serious disadvantages to > the way Soren has things working? I don't think its too terrible to have devices made in probe order, but it would be *nice* to have it if you are fiddling and removing/inserting a device and rebooting (I've done this debugging stuff) and IMHO it would suck having to edit fstab everytime. OK, so its not gonna happen very often, *but* it would be nice to have :) --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.990304105527.doconnor>