Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 09:38:28 +0800 From: Sato Kentney <satokentney@gmail.com> To: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> Cc: FreeBSD Net <net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: dragonflybsd's ipfw Message-ID: <CAD3kpuX8ruHA%2BnqGNp6vhLJdCpBv1M_G1OS%2BCROXU8te9kUF8w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20141117193354.T31139@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <CAD3kpuU8jQjMdfEiGNwYLToJDSZWGbJgQTzGeAFEw1UBLY4M3Q@mail.gmail.com> <20141117193354.T31139@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
i agree, i am not good in english as networking administor from Tokyo. but when i read the page, i see that the main idea is so call "modular design" and there is a long way to catch up the freebsd's ipfw anyway, i dont think it can compare to freebsd's ipfw, as Smith said their ipfw is the version without in-kernel NAT and tables .all these important features On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> wrote: > On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:48:13 +0800, Sato Kentney wrote: > > > I saw a email in dragonflybsd email list, someone is doing this! > > http://www.dragonflybsd.org/docs/ipfw2/ > > We've had 'ipfw2' for a very long while. I couldn't help wondering why > DF wouldn't just import our many years of development and experience > rather than using bycn82's 'rewrite'? .. but DF already has ipfw2: > > http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/cgi/web-man?command=3Dipfw§ion=3DANY > > man page dated October 2008. Before tables, in-kernel NAT, later > dummynet updates and no doubt more. So why not start from there? > > cheers, Ian > --=20 =E3=81=82=E3=82=8A=E3=81=8C=E3=81=A8=E3=81=86 =E4=BD=90=E8=97=A4=E6=9F=AF=E5=BE=B7 Sato K.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAD3kpuX8ruHA%2BnqGNp6vhLJdCpBv1M_G1OS%2BCROXU8te9kUF8w>