Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 16:52:01 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.2: will standard-supfile point to RELENG_5_2? Message-ID: <XFMail.20031208165201.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.1.20031208203541.02dfef08@popserver.sfu.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08-Dec-2003 Colin Percival wrote: > At 12:29 08/12/2003 -0800, Doug White wrote: >>Doubtful -- standard-supfile is for grabbing -current. If you want a >>specific tag, you need to specify it. I just copy the same cvsupfile >>around to different machines as I build them so I don't forget :) > > RELENG_x_y's standard-supfile has tracked RELENG_x_y for every release > branch so far except for x=5,y=1. Yes, that seems sensible. If we were going to have a permament current supfile, current-supfile would be a better name for that type of file. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20031208165201.jhb>