Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 19:46:59 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 252664] change "-dirty" uname -v designator to something less obtrusive Message-ID: <bug-252664-227-qwp76a34S3@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-252664-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-252664-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252664 Ulrich Spörlein <uqs@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|Open |Closed --- Comment #4 from Ulrich Spörlein <uqs@FreeBSD.org> --- It's not absurd, but I think the best place to change the terminology would be in upstream, i.e. git itself, so that FreeBSD (for once!) uses whatever upstream uses and doesn't come up with its own way of doing or naming things. The "dirty" here will not be visible to regular users anyway. If we get actual reports that people feel weirded out by this, we can and should re-evaluate. For now, let's keep the industry standard wording here. "dirty" is a good opposite of a "clean" build or tree. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-252664-227-qwp76a34S3>