Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 19:46:59 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 252664] change "-dirty" uname -v designator to something less obtrusive Message-ID: <bug-252664-227-qwp76a34S3@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-252664-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-252664-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D252664 Ulrich Sp=C3=B6rlein <uqs@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|Open |Closed --- Comment #4 from Ulrich Sp=C3=B6rlein <uqs@FreeBSD.org> --- It's not absurd, but I think the best place to change the terminology would= be in upstream, i.e. git itself, so that FreeBSD (for once!) uses whatever upstream uses and doesn't come up with its own way of doing or naming thing= s. The "dirty" here will not be visible to regular users anyway. If we get act= ual reports that people feel weirded out by this, we can and should re-evaluate. For now, let's keep the industry standard wording here. "dirty" is a good opposite of a "clean" build or tree. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-252664-227-qwp76a34S3>