Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 17:48:28 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Current FreeBSD <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: IPFW in CURRENT: SMP-friendly? Message-ID: <5138C4DC.9030209@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <20130307154828.GG48089@FreeBSD.org> References: <51388897.4080102@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20130307154828.GG48089@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] Am 03/07/13 16:48, schrieb Gleb Smirnoff: > On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 01:31:19PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: > O> There is work going on to move the OpenBSD pf(1) towards a more SMP > O> friendly entity - this reduces CPU load and should raise throughput. > O> > O> Are there any plans for FreeBSD "native" packet filter IPFW2 to gain the > O> same? Or, to ask it differently, IS ipfw(1), the freeBSD native > O> packetfilter, already SMP friendly and so better suited for multicore > O> architectures? > > Yes, it is already not under a single lock for a long time. > Thank you very much. Regards, Oliver [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJROMTcAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N88vMIANRd3hErD612zGb5REQOBzjB zYI1gNGHEt/sE0H7KcX7wyqTZtFa9KlJ+fdVLz49roYwbYi9ERZugftEFZtIHIgH 2wik9ATWpXDCeDfnyTpIJCXF5z8t7HMXVgaKy599SiGShIdV68pCUVpm/mOSl+NR rN+HV/Xml6xBebDCLR+8nod37kAjLu4EVTdS2itpPGvbzRl7Npsq8iCpL/8Acar0 pLVdmg1wlKm/GbIc3vLsyrPBnp8FlNvrJnW134eeUWTiTtvdx32utTbi3znfnJ65 wR/YqGduJKHog+tf6bWluxejz/Mtf/VOd01y0yxJTfarJtJMWtM2LVhp+4s3emw= =4Rpm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5138C4DC.9030209>