Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 14:43:15 -0300 From: Renato Botelho <rbgarga@gmail.com> To: Steve Clement <steve@ion.lu> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, dinoex@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Ports: webalizer/geolizer Message-ID: <747dc8f305070110432c3995f6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <42C57263.8020307@ion.lu> References: <42C57263.8020307@ion.lu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01/07/05, Steve Clement <steve@ion.lu> wrote: > Is there any good reason having 2 different ports for these very similar > ports? >=20 > I have 1Patch to commit and that would mean twice the work. (Apart from > that the japanese addition from the "main" webalizer port aren't in > geolizer...) >=20 > WEBALIZER_GEOLIZER=3Dyes make install >=20 > would't that be the solution? > also Geolizer is unmaintained and webalizer isn't. You can analyze, and, it it's possible, transfer geolizer to webalizer port and send a PR asking to delete geolizer. Regards --=20 Renato Botelho ICQ: 54596223 AIM: RBGargaBR
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?747dc8f305070110432c3995f6>