Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:45:23 -0400 From: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Heads up: gtar gone from base system Message-ID: <20050405164523.GA51452@VARK.MIT.EDU> In-Reply-To: <200504051833.08198.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> References: <4243B57D.5050204@freebsd.org> <20050405114907.GA49792@VARK.MIT.EDU> <4252AFD0.8090701@freebsd.org> <200504051833.08198.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Tuesday, 5. April 2005 17:33, Tim Kientzle wrote: > > David Schultz wrote: > > > ... a quick fix would be to accept --use-compress-program as > > > an undocumented option and ignore it. > > > > Tempting, tempting.... ;-/ > > Not one bit, IMHO. I can't imagine a single case where something would use > --use-compress-program and it would continue to work if the tar in question > simply ignored it. Why not? If libarchive supports the compression format, it will automatically detect it and perform the appropriate decompression. > In ark's case, ark would just fail to extract an archive > completely silently, making it harder to diagnose what's going wrong. Why? If libarchive doesn't support the compression format, then it will fail and ark should detect this.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050405164523.GA51452>