Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 07:56:49 -0400 From: "Michael Scheidell" <scheidell@secnap.net> To: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org>, "Dmitry Pryanishnikov" <dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Problem with portaudit's database Message-ID: <B3BCAF4246A8A84983A80DAB50FE72424C5F1F@secnap2.secnap.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org=20 > [mailto:owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of=20 > Simon L. Nielsen > Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 7:35 AM > To: Dmitry Pryanishnikov > Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Problem with portaudit's database > On 2005.09.07 10:35:21 +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: >=20 > > Yesterday portaudit notified me about squid's vulnerability, but=20 > > today it didn't (despite I haven't upgraded squid). This=20 > has attracted=20 > > my attention, so I've compared yesterday's and today's=20 > auditfile.tbz: > >=20 > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 29875 Sep 6 15:40 auditfile.tbz > >=20 > > vs. > >=20 > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 5685 Sep 7 10:11 auditfile.tbz I had a similar problem (which was fixed with portaudit -F) so, I assume that for a short time, the audit db was corrupted.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B3BCAF4246A8A84983A80DAB50FE72424C5F1F>