Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 08:49:41 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why isn't __progname declared in a header? Message-ID: <20020324084941.B26339@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200203241437.g2OEbuXl083121@grimreaper.grondar.org>; from mark@grondar.za on Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 02:37:55PM %2B0000 References: <20020325001528.B44805-100000@gamplex.bde.org> <200203241437.g2OEbuXl083121@grimreaper.grondar.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 02:37:55PM +0000, Mark Murray wrote: > > > Next question, what header should it go into? I'm quite happy to do > > > the work. > > > > libc/include/libc_private.h is almost right. > > Hmm. It is implemented in csu/*/crt[01].c, so how about > csu/common/_progname.h? Why create a header for just one line that is easy to duplicate in the only 4 places it is used? -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020324084941.B26339>