Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 15:30:23 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 233405] sparc64: DWARF unwinder required for GCC 4.2.1 retirement Message-ID: <bug-233405-227-h3nH0pM2js@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-233405-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-233405-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D233405 --- Comment #11 from Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to Ed Maste from comment #10) For us, they=E2=80=99re both defined, and we only support sparc64. The un-= numbered variant was already used in that file, so I just followed existing conventi= on. The upstream numbers (cursor words) are probably intended for 32bit Sparc. = So this isn=E2=80=99t literally the patch to upstream, if you cared to, but re= taining 32bit Sparc isn=E2=80=99t too difficult. It=E2=80=99s odd- the clang/llvm sparc support is heavily v8 (pre-64bit) fo= cused, but the (rough, minimal) LLD support is V9 *only*. Different contributors, patchwork support... --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-233405-227-h3nH0pM2js>