Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 11 Nov 2019 15:30:23 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 233405] sparc64: DWARF unwinder required for GCC 4.2.1 retirement
Message-ID:  <bug-233405-227-h3nH0pM2js@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-233405-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233405

--- Comment #11 from Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org> ---
(In reply to Ed Maste from comment #10)
For us, they’re both defined, and we only support sparc64.  The un-numbered
variant was already used in that file, so I just followed existing convention.

The upstream numbers (cursor words) are probably intended for 32bit Sparc.  So
this isn’t literally the patch to upstream, if you cared to, but retaining
32bit Sparc isn’t too difficult.

It’s odd- the clang/llvm sparc support is heavily v8 (pre-64bit) focused, but
the (rough, minimal) LLD support is V9 *only*. Different contributors,
patchwork support...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-233405-227-h3nH0pM2js>