Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 17:26:06 +0000 (GMT) From: Jonathon McKitrick <jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> To: Alejandro Ramirez <ales@megared.net.mx> Cc: Stan Brown <stanb@netcom.com>, Free BSD Questions list <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: fsck and large filesystems. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.9912231725130.21789-100000@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <01f701bf4d68$b75b1340$d2630a0a@megared.net.mx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 23 Dec 1999, Alejandro Ramirez wrote: > It is supposed that if you are using softupdates, you will not have to >run fsck again, but its still enabled by default, just to make sure that >everything its ok (by now), this its a quote from a talk with Mr. Kirk >Mckusick at FreeBSDCon. So does this mean softupdates obviates the need to run fsck on an dirty partition? What about / if it isn't soft-enabled? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.9912231725130.21789-100000>