Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 11:51:07 +0000 (GMT) From: Paul Richards <p.richards@elsevier.co.uk> To: davidg@freefall.freebsd.org (David Greenman) Cc: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sys@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/vm vm_object.c Message-ID: <199603291151.LAA01479@tees> In-Reply-To: <199603290630.WAA18828@freefall.freebsd.org> from "David Greenman" at Mar 28, 96 10:30:20 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In reply to David Greenman who said > > davidg 96/03/28 22:30:20 > > Branch: sys/vm RELENG_2_1_0 > Modified: sys/vm vm_object.c > Log: > Revert to previous calculation of vm_object_cache_max: it simply works > better in most real-world cases. This comes after extensive analysis of > file caching behavior on wcarchive... Is wcarchive really that good a platform for deciding what good generic solutions are? Very few of us run wcarchive's. -- Paul Richards. Originative Solutions Ltd. (Netcraft Ltd. contractor) Elsevier Science TIS online journal project. Email: p.richards@elsevier.co.uk Phone: 0370 462071 (Mobile), +44 (0)1865 843155
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199603291151.LAA01479>