Date: Sat, 14 Jan 1995 09:46:01 -0800 From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM> To: guido@gvr.win.tue.nl (Guido van Rooij) Cc: FreeBSD-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com (FreeBSD-hackers) Subject: Re: these damn signals 10 and 11 Message-ID: <199501141746.JAA02308@corbin.Root.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 14 Jan 95 16:31:19 %2B0100." <199501141531.QAA29161@gvr.win.tue.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>What does it mean when the kernel starts killing proceses >with signals 10 and 11? The system is not out of memory or swapsapce. >The system is a 486 66MHz that is runnng 2.0R. Any known problems in >the vm area? Probably. We've fixed problems that could cause this. 2.0 was definately a bit rough around the edges...which is why we've recommended to people that really need stability to stick with 1.1.5+patches. The promise of 2.1 is stability and better performance. The *next* 2.1 snapshot should be fairly stable - we're working on this, anyway. -DG
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199501141746.JAA02308>