Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:01:01 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>, Max Laier <max@love2party.net>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is fork() hook ever possible? Message-ID: <20080917090101.GC57480@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <89506.1221638697@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <20080917075513.GB55535@nagual.pp.ru> <89506.1221638697@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 08:04:57AM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >The situation is not so simple since the library functions can call > >ar4random() internally (like mktemp() family already and always does) > > I have a really hard time seeing how this could become a performance > issue, ever. The performance issue happens when application tries to call arc4random() in the loop. > The solution however, is simple: Just have these hidden library calls > to arc4random call a wrapper function that does the pid check. We can control our own arc4random() internal calls inside our own libs in such way but can't control 3rd party libs or programs arc4random() calls (consider ports). There is no special mentions of pid check needed in arc4random() general API, so 3rd party code will tends to not come to that matter. -- http://ache.pp.ru/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080917090101.GC57480>