Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 22:34:25 +0000 (UTC) From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backtick versus $() Message-ID: <loom.20110224T233208-284@post.gmane.org> References: <AANLkTinJKcy8NyFzW9=6yKEY%2BF_payQVM108_=B7Gyjr@mail.gmail.com> <loom.20110224T210222-768@post.gmane.org> <AANLkTinQ4MMwWq77k1t-SwqE%2BzPep6VCNS9AKdT_H08b@mail.gmail.com> <loom.20110224T214917-136@post.gmane.org> <AANLkTik88V5Bb2BWM0Kpv3rWfek9_%2BgjqmEt6UbsVjpS@mail.gmail.com> <loom.20110224T220407-811@post.gmane.org> <AANLkTikAB--0Hrw76cbdzgfmeJMPt_N7isaw%2Byn_-QMn@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.BSM.4.64L.1102242135020.1945@herc.mirbsd.org> <20110224213322.GA13089@guilt.hydra> <loom.20110224T225518-308@post.gmane.org> <20110224221057.GA13262@guilt.hydra>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chad Perrin <perrin <at> apotheon.com> writes: > 1. You think some measure of popularity of a decision makes it correct. No. > 2. You don't like (t)csh. No. I just point out it’s not a suitable scripting shell. > 3. You think your opinions are so self-evident that everybody will just > immediately understand them, their reasoning, and the best way to proceed > from there. I may have some shortcomings when it comes to getting a point across. > 1. Is it a good idea to replace (t)csh? Probably. (Even Android uses mksh these days.) But that’s up to you guys. On the other hand, it’s tradition. But then, I never asked for this (here, I did in other places) either. See above. Anyway, goodnight (and I’ll probably not get back to this thread, just hope to have brought some thought-provoking impulse).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?loom.20110224T233208-284>