Date: Thu, 11 Jan 1996 10:44:10 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net> To: "Garrett A. Wollman" <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: arrrgh, this was working Sunday... Message-ID: <199601111744.KAA21551@rocky.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: <9601111739.AA15817@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> References: <9601040106.AA00652@tera.com> <Pine.BSF.3.91.960108222417.886A-100000@parody.tecc.co.uk> <9601111707.AA17486@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> <199601111732.KAA21487@rocky.sri.MT.net> <9601111739.AA15817@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> A normally configured system /does/ run a nameserver, if only to cache > >> the results of previous queries. > > > Hogwash. On my local network, is simply wasting memory and more > > maintenance to run a namserver on all the machines > > It doesn't take any maintenance at all to run a nameserver on all the > machines. I have to set them up to run, and when they die (which unfortunately they do :( ) I have to go re-start them. It's much easier to point everyone at the central site, so when it dies it's *very* obvious. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601111744.KAA21551>