Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 16:32:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: tcsh.cat Message-ID: <200106152032.QAA26113@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106152249470.84573-100000@besplex.bde.org> References: <20010615160248.A16012@nagual.pp.ru> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106152249470.84573-100000@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Fri, 15 Jun 2001 22:57:56 +1000 (EST), Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> said: > Maybe, but this doesn't seem to be permitted by POSIX.1-200x: The response I got to a similar question about symbolic links suggests that the definition of ``path name resolution'' is supposed to be the final word on the meaning and interpretation of symbolic links. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200106152032.QAA26113>