Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 12:26:40 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: Forrest Aldrich <forrie@navipath.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Package installation location Message-ID: <20001210122640.B20201@spawn.nectar.com> In-Reply-To: <xzpitosgn0w.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>; from des@ofug.org on Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 07:16:15PM %2B0100 References: <20001210125026.A27718@drama.navipath.com> <xzpitosgn0w.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 07:16:15PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Forrest Aldrich <forrie@navipath.com> writes: > > Within the scope of this problem, would it not be simple to code in a > > configuration diretive in the build process, such that a simple entry > > in /etc/make.conf would tell the ports build where to install ($prefix)? > > You're about six years late. The ports system has used $PREFIX for > precisely this purpose since October 1994. Actually see LOCALBASE, and perhaps X11BASE, which influence PREFIX. This is what you'd want to set in /etc/make.conf. -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001210122640.B20201>