Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 15:50:46 -0400 From: Antoine Beaupre <anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx> To: Max Okumoto <okumoto@ucsd.edu> Cc: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.freebsd.org>, libh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: util vs tools Message-ID: <8E9D90E9-612A-11D6-93FA-0050E4A0BB3F@anarcat.ath.cx> In-Reply-To: <hfadrdxepz.fsf@multivac.sdsc.edu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Great! Thanks for your hard work, Okumoto. A. Le Lundi 6 mai 2002, à 03:23 , Max Okumoto a écrit : > You guys are right. We should only have one. It was just > habit from a previous project where they seperated scripts > from tools which were build from src. I will move all my stuff > into tools. I would also like to move find_classes_descriptions.pl > into tools. > > Max Okumoto > > Antoine Beaupre <anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx> writes: >> Well, as far as I can remember, both didn't exist until recently. >> >> A. >> >> Le Lundi 6 mai 2002, ‡ 01:39 , Jordan Hubbard a Ècrit : >> >>> Probably historical - I don't see any problem with consolidating them. >>> >>>> Why have a util *AND* tools directory? >>>> >>>> Seems to me the utils in there should be both in tools *or* util. I'd >>>> rather have them in tools. >>>> >>>> A. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the messagehelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8E9D90E9-612A-11D6-93FA-0050E4A0BB3F>