Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 08:23:57 +0000 (GMT) From: Munechika Sumikawa <sumikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp> To: nectar@FreeBSD.org Cc: sumikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libipsec pfkey_dump.c Message-ID: <20030417.082357.81502723.sumikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <20030416124657.GD72501@madman.celabo.org> References: <200304161121.h3GBLDhJ040405@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030416124657.GD72501@madman.celabo.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
nectar> These sizes seem arbitrary. Previously, at 10 bytes, they were just a nectar> bit too small to hold the representation of the largest 32-bit nectar> unsigned integer. Now at 20 bytes, they are just a bit too small to nectar> hold the representation of the largest 64-bit unsigned integer. This nectar> seems sloppy. (As does using a 128 byte buffer to hold the result of nectar> concatenating two 20 byte buffers.) You are right. I've changed to 128 bytes. It can be used until we support 512bit CPU :-) -- Sumikawa
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030417.082357.81502723.sumikawa>