Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 10:26:57 +0200 From: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> To: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: Upgrading to DocBook 5.0 Message-ID: <51D3E051.5070506@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <519FA4FE.4030305@FreeBSD.org> References: <519FA4FE.4030305@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Em 24-05-2013 19:35, Gabor Kovesdan escreveu: > I'm working on upgrading our documentation set to DocBook 5.0 and I'd > like to discuss some details. We have some customizations and strange > uses, which can be expressed with DocBook 5.0's own vocabulary. This > upgrade is a good opportunity to change these, as well. I propose the > following changes in our vocabulary: One more thing to discuss: shall we maintain the sect1, sect2, ... elements or just use section? The section element can have another section element embedded and the numbering in the rendered version is inferred by the level of embedment. This is more uniform and less redundant. In own docs that I write with DocBook I only use section and it works fine. Opinions? Gabor
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51D3E051.5070506>