Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 16:54:51 -0600 From: Guy Helmer <guy.helmer@palisadesystems.com> To: Alexandre Biancalana <biancalana@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD at Amazon EC2 status Message-ID: <2ADD8BE6-31F1-4690-8966-8DF8B9968E10@palisadesystems.com> In-Reply-To: <CAGF-nS6RJ5bt2mXMvTovaKfwCoOLX6i4VA2VMaqYQ%2BnQ-mQrPw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAGF-nS6RJ5bt2mXMvTovaKfwCoOLX6i4VA2VMaqYQ%2BnQ-mQrPw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jan 3, 2012, at 11:07 AM, Alexandre Biancalana wrote: > Hi lists, >=20 > What=B4s is the current state of FreeBSD running on Amazon EC2 ? Is > this stable ? Looking at Colin's status page > (http://www.daemonology.net/freebsd-on-ec2/) looks like there=B4s no > active development on that. >=20 > Does someone running production workload with FreeBSD on EC2 ? >=20 > I'm interested in running network (dns and http with accept filter) > and memory/buffer cache intensive applications on m1.small, m1.large > and m2.xlarge instances. >=20 > Any thoughts ? I haven't stress-tested any EC2 systems recently, but when I did late = last summer/fall, they worked fine for me. I had to do some tuning of = the nmbclusters to handle the data rates I was using, but I think that = would be expected even if running on bare metal. Guy -------- This message has been scanned by ComplianceSafe, powered by Palisade's PacketSure.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2ADD8BE6-31F1-4690-8966-8DF8B9968E10>