Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:03:20 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Jamie Gritton <jamie@FreeBSD.org> Cc: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Marking some FS as jailable Message-ID: <20130213090320.GC44004@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <511B1F55.3080500@FreeBSD.org> References: <20130212194047.GE12760@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <511B1F55.3080500@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--tqI+Z3u+9OQ7kwn0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:06:29PM -0700, Jamie Gritton wrote:
> On 02/12/13 12:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to mark some filesystem as jailable, here is the one I nee=
d:
> > linprocfs, tmpfs and fdescfs, I was planning to do it with adding a
> > allow.mount.${fs} for each one.
> >
> > Anyone has an objection?
> >
> > regards,
> > Bapt
>=20
> Would it make sense for linprocfs to use the existing allow.mount.procfs
> flag?
ok I'll have a look at how it is done, I will also use the same for linsysf=
s as
they are quite close.
regards,
Bapt
--tqI+Z3u+9OQ7kwn0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAlEbVtgACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwzzACgr+Jhc7WX6iX+Qb3Mz/KgqsUM
cKoAn2wPZ3qy6FPb9G/rgaPOWdEd8wqo
=C7o2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--tqI+Z3u+9OQ7kwn0--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130213090320.GC44004>