Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:26:05 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> To: kpneal@pobox.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Brandon Allbery <allbery.b@gmail.com>, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: top, fixed buffer length in utils.c Message-ID: <20150218142605.28e2eafb@B85M-HD3-0.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: <20150218025100.GA49517@neutralgood.org> References: <20150201175159.7fa88d16@B85M-HD3-0.alogt.com> <20150216035636.GA80472@neutralgood.org> <CAKFCL4UA8fz1oinOPB89dGQtP=TjuthhWka9efeo0mgnS6aNZA@mail.gmail.com> <201502171657.07538.jhb@freebsd.org> <20150218025100.GA49517@neutralgood.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 21:51:00 -0500 kpneal@pobox.com wrote: > TL;DR: we shouldn't go littering our source tree with portability crap > just to handle a case (64 bit ints) that is probably many, many years > in the future. > an interesting attitude ... Erich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150218142605.28e2eafb>