Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:01:18 +0200 From: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> To: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>, Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com>, Andreas Hauser <andy@splashground.de>, "Devon H.O'Dell" <dodell@offmyserver.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@www.freebsd.org Subject: Re: fontsize and dpi (was Re: Beta2: Nice job!) Message-ID: <20050823140118.GB67999@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <200508232220.21506.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> References: <17161.55733.272571.61428@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20050822185748.22499.qmail@paladin.fortunaty.net> <20050823124028.GA67999@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <200508232220.21506.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 10:20:20PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Tuesday 23 August 2005 22:10, Stijn Hoop wrote: > > Why this isn't already the default is beyond me... Or am I miscalculati= ng > > dpi with the standard 1280x1024 17" flatpanel? >=20 > X "Just Works It Out" these days. >=20 > Any DDC capable card/monitor will usually get this correct. Yep. And on my broken-but-still-useful KVM switch which doesn't relay DDC I need to specify it. I still don't get why 75dpi is the default; isn't that 15" monitor specifications? I do understand that the situation has improved, and it certainly is a very minor nit, but still... --Stijn --=20 An Orb is for life, not just for Christmas. --vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDCywuY3r/tLQmfWcRAhHoAJ0ayyQJfzGKR23W7yBld5+B5Cud1ACeIwo5 aX4gx2qRrXCydVI9Mzikjyc= =60x5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050823140118.GB67999>